pulchritude: (1)
M君 ([personal profile] pulchritude) wrote in [personal profile] snowynight 2011-05-24 06:38 pm (UTC)

imo someone who tags something as 'platonic' probably isn't meaning asexual as the op means in this essay, though I don't rule out the homoeroticism that may be present. I suppose the idea of labelling an asexual romantic relationship of some sort as platonic just annoys me, as it implies that sex is necessary for a romantic relationship, which is mainstream discourse.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting